<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mohammad Jalali&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mjalali.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mjalali.com/blog</link>
	<description>Technical Stuff for the Tech Friendly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skype 101 &#8211; Skype Architecture &#8211; Work in Progress by Mohammad</title>
		<link>http://www.mjalali.com/blog/?p=10&#038;cpage=1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mjalali.com/blog/?p=10#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the delay. I am not aware of any caching done on the intermediate nodes. From the security standpoint, note that any node can capture the network traffic passing through them. Therefore, in theory, a super node can capture the traffic belonging to the child nodes and break the encryption. Although, this is possible, it is an extremely hard task and highly unlikely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the delay. I am not aware of any caching done on the intermediate nodes. From the security standpoint, note that any node can capture the network traffic passing through them. Therefore, in theory, a super node can capture the traffic belonging to the child nodes and break the encryption. Although, this is possible, it is an extremely hard task and highly unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skype 101 &#8211; Skype Architecture &#8211; Work in Progress by David Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.mjalali.com/blog/?p=10&#038;cpage=1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mjalali.com/blog/?p=10#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this Mohammad.

I&#039;d like to clarify one concern about the Skype architecture.   Is there any intermediate storage of the instant message content, whether on SCs, SNs, or the central Skype [login] Server?   Or is this content delivered point to point, without intermediate storage.   This is a crucial point of concern for me.

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this Mohammad.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to clarify one concern about the Skype architecture.   Is there any intermediate storage of the instant message content, whether on SCs, SNs, or the central Skype [login] Server?   Or is this content delivered point to point, without intermediate storage.   This is a crucial point of concern for me.</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to respond.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real-time Packet Type Detection Using Port Scanning by Fiddling Around with Skype &#124; Mike Conley&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mjalali.com/blog/?p=102&#038;cpage=1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiddling Around with Skype &#124; Mike Conley&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mjalali.com/blog/?p=102#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to check out Mohammad&#8217;s blog post about this project. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to check out Mohammad&#8217;s blog post about this project. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
